Showing posts with label romantic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label romantic. Show all posts

Friday, August 31, 2012

Management (2008) Review

Management (2008)
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
The premise isn't new - dweeb falls for babe - babe finds him repulsive at first, but then grows to love his sincerity and ordinary ways - dweeb and babe ride off into the sunset having both grown into nice people. Yeah right!
It's a hard sell at the best of times, but "Management" just about pulls it off - and it does so because of excellent writing and the stunning acting capabilities of its two principal leads.
STEVE ZAHN plays the hapless, but sweetly naïve Mike Cranshaw who is living and working with his parents in their small motel "The Kingman Motor Inn" in the town of Kingman in Arizona (off Route 66). Mike's Mum Trish is effectively running the solid but uninspiring joint (a beautifully understated performance by MARGO MARTINDALE), while her says-little and does-even-less husband Jerry (FRED WARD at his effective best) seems stuck in a rut he doesn't know how to get out of.
Life at the Motel is routine and boring - especially for the friendless and womanless Mike. But just occasionally - he gets up enough courage to bring a bottle of plonk around to a lady guest in her chalet and try on his `complimentary' wine routine. It never works. But this time - Mike's heart gets more than it bargained for when it encounters the big-city, tight-suited Jennifer Aniston character Susan Claussen, who's in town from Baltimore to flog paintings to corporate clients. Planes to appointments, car rentals to accommodation and a laptop on the bedside, she is the very epitome of a young executive woman going places. Mike is the last person in the world Sue would consider dating, let alone spending a lifetime with...the idea is almost laughable to her. But of course she keeps coming back to his sweetness and he pursues her because he's besotted and simply doesn't understand 'no' - nor get the meaning of boundaries.
Along the way Mike encounters Zen Buddhists, takes piano lessons, sleeps in a basement in a Chinese restaurant and jumps out of a plane. There's one particularly great scene where Sue figures if she lets Mike touch her perfectly formed posterior, he'll give up and she can get on with her presentation notes and get a night's sleep (title above). She leans over and presents the said rear for his delectation. With his hand placed on her right cheek, they talk about weather conditions in Maryland - it's both visually and lyrically - very, very funny.
But what keeps you watching is the growing tenderness between the two. Mike may not be the smartest tool in the kit, but he is heartfelt and sincere - and in many ways despite her obvious intelligence and affluence, Sue isn't. She needs to learn that and he needs to grow up. Woody Harrelson also turns up in a great pantomime role as the ex-punk-rocker Jango who is now rich through dog handling. Later Mike's Mum Trish becomes gravely ill - thereby presenting the two men in her life with changes both may not want but need...and on it goes.
Written and Directed by first-timer STEPHEN BELBER and produced by SIDNEY KEMMEL, the offbeat rom-com "Management" hit the US screens in May 2009 receiving excellent reviews. And on the strength of this September 2009 BLU RAY - it's easy to see why.
I first spotted Steve Zahn in a wonderful film called "Happy, Texas" where he was paired up with Britain's Jeremy Northam as two escaped convicts trapped in a hick town which tames their thieving ways and changes both of them for the better. Zahn's been bubbling under for years, but in "Management" he really shines. A lesser actor might have overdone the inner nerd to go for hammy laughs - and in the real world his character's ludicrous naivety might even have been insufferable, but Zahn makes you ache for Mike's attempts at wooing Susan.
Aniston is more capable now as an actress than she's ever been. Her character's disbelief and dismissive awkwardness at first is so believable - and as the movie progresses - her barriers very subtly start coming down - to a point where you really do believe she would look at Mike as a 'nice guy' - and as 'good for her' - and that's more important than all the material crap in-between. She is superb in the part.
Although it feels like an Indie production, the BLU RAY image is beautiful throughout - really crisp - you are aware almost all of the time that this is high-def and not a soft DVD image.
The extras are great fun too; a feature-length commentary by Stephen Belber and Steve Zahn, Gag Reels and Bloopers (very funny outtakes - mostly of the whole cast giggling and fluffing lines), several Deleted Scenes and a Trailer.
"Management" is not going to bolster up my gravity-bound man-titties or lessen the amount of hair growing out my nasal passages - but it has enriched my brain. At its core is a truly lovely premise - that love will out - and corny or not - that 'is' what many of us believe.
"Management" isn't a masterpiece by any stretch of the imagination, but you can't help but think that the world is a nicer place, because this sweet little ode to hope is in it.
A nice little movie...

Click Here to see more reviews about: Management (2008)

Jennifer Aniston (Marley & Me, Office Space) and Steve Zahn (Sunshine Cleaning, Saving Silverman) star in this "rare romantic comedy" (Los Angeles Times) that's bursting with originality, humor and sweetness. It's lust at first sight for laid-back motel night manager Mike (Zahn) when Sue (Aniston), an uptight sales rep, checks in. Convinced that Sue is his dream girl, Mike shakes up his slacker life in an outrageous pursuit across the country. But can he steal her away from her hot-tempered boyfriend (Woody Harrelson, No Country for Old Men)? Both Mike and Sue must go on their own twisted journeys to find out if what they really need is each other. Jennifer Aniston Answers Our Questions A: You play the ‘straight & narrow’ character to Steve Zahn’s funny man. What is it like acting in a comedy where you have to play the more serious role?J: The role of Sue is sort of awkward and it felt very human. I just loved it. When you read romantic comedy after romantic comedy, and then you get to read one where the characters are so unique and oddly flawed and broken, that's beautiful. I signed on to the project immediately. A: Was it hard to keep a straight face when acting opposite Steve and Woody? J: What do you think? It was impossible! Steve can just give me a look and I’ll lose it. Pretty much everything he does makes me laugh. I think part of it is because he’s so accessible and open. And Woody and I started cracking up before we even got to the set when we were reading the script to each other on the phone. Laughing while the cameras are rolling on the set is fun, but you're not supposed to do it. That only makes it harder not to laugh, of course! A: Rumor is that you helped convince Woody to agree to be in the film. Is this true and if so how did you do it? J: That is one rumor about me that’s 100% true! Woody was the directors first choice to play Sue’s husband in the film but he passed on the project because he didn’t like the character. So (director) Stephen rewrote the script and asked me to get Woody on the phone. I actually made a long-distance call and read parts of the script to Woody until he was convinced. I’m so glad he signed on – we had a blast working together. A: Both you and Steve starred in “The Object of My Affection” over 10 years ago, with just a few scenes together, and he also guested on “Friends.” Do you have any memories of Steve from back then? J: Steve and I have known each other since the second season of Friends when he played Phoebe’s husband. So I knew who he was but when we did Object of My Affection, I got to know him better. We just had a ball. Steve and (costar) Paul Rudd became like Frick and Frack during that shoot. They actually had T-shirts made that said ''Double Trouble.'' So I knew he would be lots of fun on the set of Management. A: What did the worst motel you’ve ever stayed in look like?J: There have been a few sketchy motels in my life, that’s for sure. But one that stands out was in a tiny little town in the Midwest somewhere. It wasn’t so much the accommodations, but the ice machine was right outside of my room. There must have been a convention of ice lovers in town because every 30 minutes or so, that machine would go off. The soothing sounds of ice hitting a plastic bucket isn’t really conducive to sleep. So now, no matter what the hotel looks like, I make sure my room is not near any sort of refreshment area! A: “Friends” was taped in front of a live audience, so you had that energy. Is doing comedy on film harder than drama on film, or are you still more comfortable with comedy? J: I’m not sure how to answer that one. Life can be dramatic and funny all in the same day just like the material for a film. So I have to work from right inside. When I step into a role, I don’t think “Oh, I’m going to exclusively use my comedy persona for this job.” That label kind of goes out the door and I concentrate on being true to the character. I think Steve and I were both able to achieve that for this film. A: We like to ask actors what they consider their most essential film, whether it’s the one they’re most proud of or the most meaningful personally. What would you say is a Jennifer Aniston essential film? J: You know, I’m not reluctant to name one film but I honestly have to say that each project I’ve done is meaningful in its own way. If I’m an actress, a producer or even a voice, I would hope that I’ve brought something fresh to the project and been true to writers vision. That being said, I think Management is just fabulous [laughs]. But I really do. A: How was it working with first-time director Stephen Belber? J: Stephen was very honest about what he was on this shoot – a first-time director. It was refreshing, as opposed to having somebody come in and try to over compensate. He asked Steve and I to rehearse together a week before shooting so it felt more like the theater projects Stephen usually works with. We were able to go through the scenes chronologically, which film actors don’t usually have the luxury of doing. I am a huge fan of Stephen’s. He has amazing instincts. A: It’s been mentioned that the entire cast/crew stayed in the same no-frills hotel while filming. What was that like? J: We stayed in a hotel in Madras Oregon – in central Oregon. I dare you to find that on a map! It was newly built but definitely no frills. Like, there was a microwave, but you couldn’t fit anything into it! Everything in the room seemed to be miniature! But because the cast and crew all stayed together, we had a fantastic time. We ate at the local restaurants and we went to a nearby bowling alley. The people of Madras were extraordinarily open and sweet which made for a really unique experience. A: What is currently in your DVD player or what are you watching right now? J: I have to say that I am a huge fan of “Mad Men” and have watched it religiously since the first season. So I never miss an opportunity to see an episode. I just love that whole 1960 New York City era.Steven Zahn Answers Our Questions A: Have you ever done anything really loony for love? S: Yeah, if you think a chicken costume is loony.I think I was in college and I hitchhiked down to Rochester, Minnesota -- my girlfriend's town -- in a chicken suit for no apparent reason. But it worked. That's kind of similar to my character Mike. [laughs] I figured if I was hitchhiking, no one would pick me up.But maybe they wouldn’t think a person in a chicken suit was going to kill them so I’d get lucky and catch a ride. I didn't have a car, but I just had to get there because I loved her. She was thrilled to see me but it was more about the journey than it was showing up. It served two purposes. A: Have you been in a situation where you thought you had a ‘special moment’ with someone to find out in fact that they didn’t feel the same? S: I have had that situation when I auditioned for a part. I thought the director and I had a special moment but then I wasn’t hired. Actually, that’s happened a lot. It’s almost as bad as being rejected by a girl, for me. But I’m pretty sure everyone, even the most beautiful or hot or whatever people have had that “I don’t feel the same” experience.I know I have but I’m not going to go into detail. I wouldn’t want to ruin my image as a leading man who always gets the ladies, ya know? A: You and Jennifer Aniston starred in “The Object of My Affection” over 10 years ago, with just a few scenes together, and you also guested on “Friends.” Do you have any memories of Jennifer from back then? S: Yeah, I played Phoebe’s husband in exactly one episode. It was terrifying – I had never done any TV and there was a group of actors who were best friends for real.I had to pretend I was a part of that world.So we knew each other enough to say “Hi”. Then we did “The Object of My Affection.” We didn’t have a lot of scenes together, but we hung out in the trailer and stuff. She remembered me from those three days when we did that movie. She’s that kind of person. If you had a conversation with her, three years from now she’d remember.It wasn't until this movie — this was what we were meant to do together. Jen and I had, it sounds stupid, but a true connection. We both knew it was going to work. We just felt it. I found her to be wonderful on so many levels. She's prepared and so giving and flexible and funny. We really worked well together and I think it comes through in the film.A: What did the worst motel you’ve ever stayed in look like? The worst motel? S: I’d have to think about that because I’ve stayed in some flea bag places. But the worst thing for me is when you don’t have a motel to stay at. I’ve done that before – had to sleep under the stars and stuff and not with any kind of camping gear. So even the grossest motel is better than that. We were lucky for this shoot because we all stayed together in the motel where the film was shot – it wasn’t luxurious or anything but spending so much time together as cast and crew made the experience special. A: We like to ask actors what they consider their most essential film, whether it’s the one they’re most proud of or the most meaningful personally. What would you say is a Steve Zahn essential film? S: I’m not sure if there’s any “essential” Steve Zahn film! [laughs]But one of the films that pops up that fans like to talk about is Suburbia that I did in ‘96. It’s a cool movie directed by Richard Linkletter. And I did the whole project experience because Eric Bogosian wrote it so I workshopped it with him then did the play in New York then did the film. And someone just told me that you can’t get it on DVD. So I’ll have to look into that because it’s one of my favorites. A: How was it working with first-time director Stephen Belber? S: Stephen was great – he was also the writer and Mike [the character] was just so well written it was one of the ridiculous moments where I said something like, "You'd be a fool not to hire me," which never works, except in this case, it did. [laughs] We even had a full week of rehearsals with us just sitting around a table reading the lines. It’s crazy that there’s no rehearsals in movies usually.But this one, we had a week where we sat all day: Jennifer, me and Steve [director Stephen Belber]. We primarily just sat and everybody else in the cast came in to rehearse. And man, did that work. By the time we finished rehearsal, I think all of us were very excited.Steve was just an amazing director—especially considering that it was his first time directing. He’s a pro. A: It’s been mentioned that the entire cast/crew stayed in the same no-frills hotel while filming. What was that like? S: Like I said, this shoot was different because of the actual physical closeness of staying and working in the same place. We’d work all day then we go to a local restaurant and have dinner and a beer or whatever. We even went bowling one time. It was a pretty unique situation. Of course, it might not have worked with a different group of folks so I’m not sure I would recommend it for every project. Yeah, thinking back it would not have worked with a lot of my films. A: What is currently in your DVD player or what are you watching right now? S: Oh man – what am I watching? You know I live on a farm in Lexington Kentucky, right?I have to say, I don’t have much time right now to kick back. I’m spending a lot of hours on a tractor. And when the goats and horses don’t need my attention, I have a 9-year-old son and a 7 year-old-daughter to spend time with. I wish I could tell you but I’m coming up blank. Of course, I highly recommend putting in the “Management” DVD. [laughs]

Buy NowGet 64% OFF

Click here for more information about Management (2008)

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

The Karate Kid II (1986) Review

The Karate Kid II (1986)
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
The first Karate Kid literally spoke to any kid who felt out of place and picked on. Strongly enough, it was a concept played out over and over again. But the evenhanded direction of Avildsen made it a triumph. So what do you do for a sequel? You get real. Not that the first one wasn't real. The threat to Daniels safety in the first movie was always there and fully realized. But take this student and mentor pair and send them to Okinawa, and you have a whole different ball game. The story centers more on Miagi and his journey home to see his dying father, and facing demons he left as a young man. Asian culture takes certain things much more seriously. Honor in this movie is a subject brought up constantly, and we see it from Daniels perspective; as an American who does not understand why these people do things they way they do in the name of honor. As Daniel comes to grips with this life code in the small village of Miagi's youth, he realizes that the bully who has targeted him this time does not hold back. He's ready to kill Daniel. He has no qualms about it either and feels it's justified. As Daniel swoons a beautiful Asian girl and finds he's getting in deeper with the affairs of Miagi's past, he holds his ground, and his good upbringing helps to hold his own honor in place. In the end, the climatic fight scene is what really makes the movie. The whole story builds up to that moment. The idea is that this fight is real, there is no competition, no points. This is not a tournament, this is not a spectacle. Daniel is fighting to stay alive. And it is more brutal then the rules laden tournament of the first movie. Morita and Maccio play off each other so well it's obvious these two have great chemistry. The teacher/student relationship is apparent from the first scene despite their polar opposite personalities. As in the first movie, each character gives the other what they are missing. Daniel gets a father figure/teacher, Miagi gets a son/student. This movie is just as good as the first in my opinion, just different. A different set of circumstances played similarly to the first one. It's as different as it can be while still holding the same values. I give it four stars only because of some very minor inconsistencies but overall, it is a very good film.

Click Here to see more reviews about: The Karate Kid II (1986)

KARATE KID 2 - DVD Movie

Buy NowGet 26% OFF

Click here for more information about The Karate Kid II (1986)

Saturday, March 17, 2012

My Best Friend's Girl (Unrated) (2008) Review

My Best Friend's Girl (Unrated) (2008)
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
Unfortunately, the sweet little plot of this movie was lost in the constant explicit language and some of the "over the top" displays by Cane's character to prove he was bad boyfriend material. I am not easily offended by language but I do think the overuse of particular words and gestures will limit the appeal to certain audiences. There is; however, a sweet little love story in there but likely only those who can get past the language will be able to find it. Scan and preview before you invite someone over to watch it with you ...

Click Here to see more reviews about: My Best Friend's Girl (Unrated) (2008)

MY BEST FRIEND'S GIRL - DVD Movie

Buy NowGet 27% OFF

Click here for more information about My Best Friend's Girl (Unrated) (2008)

Thursday, February 2, 2012

The Piano (1993) Review

The Piano (1993)
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
Jane Campion's "The Piano" does what many truly great films do: It inspires fascinating discussion and provokes mixed reactions. The male friend with whom I saw it back in 1993 and I were so enthralled that we kept our significant others waiting to leave for our respective Christmas vacations because we kept phoning each other to discuss symbolism and interesting themes in the movie. While I continue to absolutely love the film, I also recognize why some viewers have not shared my reaction. Perhaps you have to have at least considered a forbidden love affair or perhaps you have to have found yourself trapped in a relationship where you feel you have lost your voice to appreciate what Campion explores.
The story centers around Ada (Holly Hunter in an Oscar-winning performance) and her daughter, Flora (Anna Paquin--who also won an Oscar for her extraordinary performance). They leave their upper-class home in Scotland after Ada's father (apparently) arranges her marriage. Ada, who has willed herself not to speak since age 6, expresses herself through her beloved piano.
The true story of who fathered Flora is never revealed in the movie, but the context suggests that she is Ada's illegimate child born from an illicit affair. The hinted-at story of Flora's conception provides a key to understanding both why Ada later begins an affair with her New Zealand neighbor Baines (Harvey Keitel) and why she makes a mail-order marriage in the first place. I suspect that Ada's aging father may have wanted to see her settled--preferably far away so that her unconventional behavior would no longer be a source of social embarassment--and given Ada's muteness and out-of-wedlock child, her father probably couldn't find a suitable suitor in mid-Victorian Scotland.
Stewart (Sam Neill) first encounters his future wife on a lonesome gray beach surrounded by her crated belongings. His Maori porters begin carrying many household items up the muddy path to his dreary homestead. But Stewart refuses to bring the piano along, despite Ada's apparent distress and Flora's pleas that her mother MUST have her piano.
Ada's piano, abandoned on the barren New Zealand beach, captures the sense of what 19th century colonial life might have been like for too many women--treasured possessions, the last ties to "civilization" left behind.
Rendered voiceless without her piano, Ada begs Stewart to return for her instrument through notes and more pleas from Flora. Finally she persuades Baines--a colonist whose tattoed face evidences the extent to which he has "gone native" and who is considered less civilized by his neighbors--to guide her back to the beach. Ada comes to life again as she, at last, gets to play. Drawn by her passion for the piano, Baines arranges with Stewart to trade land for the piano. Without consulting his wife, Stewart assures him that Ada will provide lessons too.
During first of these lessons, Ada strikes her own bargain with Baines, whom she still considers a boor: She will trade sexual favors to earn back her piano, one key at a time. Ultimately, her reluctant bargain grows into full-blown love and passion. The dark, brooding tone of "The Piano," however, suggests that something in this situation will go tragically, and probably violently, wrong.
Campion has filled her movie with haunting piano music (actually played by Hunter) and intriguing imagery. The metaphor of piano as voice and losing and regaining one's voice, Flora's role in changing her mother's fate, the question of whether Ada's bargain reflects a woman taking control of her life or just being victimized in a different way, and many other complexities make this a movie worth watching again and again and again.

Click Here to see more reviews about: The Piano (1993)

Ada is a mute woman who travels with her daughter and piano from scotland to bush country new zealand for an arranged marriage to a wealthy landowner. The relationship sours when her husband trades her beloved piano to their neighbor baines.Studio: Lions Gate Home Ent.Release Date: 02/01/2005Starring: Holly Hunter Harvey KeitelRun time: 121 minutesRating: RDirector: Jane Campion

Buy Now

Click here for more information about The Piano (1993)

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

The Inkwell (1994) Review

The Inkwell (1994)
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
How often dow we see movies about a teenage brother's coming of age that aren't violent or gang-related? Matty Rich(whatever he's doing now) did a superb job directing this film about an awkward teen vacationing with his parents in Martha's Vineyard visiting his well-to-do relatives.
He falls for the snot-nose Lauren who uses him to get back at her boyfriend who dropped her. Meanwhile he is also looking out for a married woman whose husband is cheating on her with other women.
It's a movie about growing up and what it means to be a person. Do all black movies have to be based on gang warfare and lewed sexual conduct?

Click Here to see more reviews about: The Inkwell (1994)

At Inkwell Beach, summer's never been so much fun! It's a time and a place where cool clothes, hot music, and good friends turn a dull family trip into the summetime vacation of a lifetime! Critics everywhere praised THE INKWELL -- the hot, big-screen comedy treat that delivers outrageous summertime fun and good time entertainment, all set to an irresistible soundtrack! Spend some time down at the shore with the funniest folks you're ever going to meet -- summer fun doesn't get any better than this!

Buy NowGet 5% OFF

Click here for more information about The Inkwell (1994)

Friday, August 26, 2011

Kate & Leopold (2001) Review

Kate and Leopold (2001)
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
This is not Meg Ryan's best film, but it is yet another highly enjoyable romantic comedy in the career of one of the most successful light comedy actresses of the past decade. But this could be a breakout film for Hugh Jackman, who is easily one of the most likable and charismatic new actors on the scene today. Easily the best thing about X-MEN was Jackman's portrayal of Wolverine. He has also appeared in SWORDFISH and SOMEONE LIKE YOU, but after seeing this film, he is clearly a very versatile and talented actor, who deserves a lot of chances in a lot of different kinds of films.
The film is enhanced by an excellent supporting cast. Both Liev Schreiber as Meg Ryan's ex-boyfriend and Breckin Meyer as her brother are extremely appealing. But the film either falls or stands on the performances of Ryan and Jackman. This is not, as I mentioned earlier, her best role, but even Meg Ryan at less than her very best is still quite good, and Hugh Jackman is enormously enjoyable. Natasha Lyonne, who I love a lot, was pretty much wasted in her role as Ryan's secretary.
The movie will invariably be compared to other time travel movies. It is a genre that has been more successful in the past than one might imagine, thanks to the BACK TO FUTURE series and the superb TIME AFTER TIME. There are a couple of gigantic holes in the plot (one involves when a particular photograph could have been taken), but overall the film isn't hard to take as sci-fi. I will say that the scenes set in 19th century New York are my favorite parts of the movie. The initial scene takes place at a ceremony in which Washington Roeblings, the engineer who built the Brooklyn Bridge and son of the man who designed it, is dedicating (I think) the completion of the second tower of the bridge. The look and feel is remarkable. Looking at the masts of the ships in the water, I kept thinking of Walt Whitman's poem "Crossing Brooklyn Ferry," which ferry the bridge superseded. Most of the imagery was surely computer generated, but the whole scene was nevertheless remarkable to look at.
All in all, this movie was a lot of fun. It won't be the greatest movie you have ever seen, but it certainly won't be the worst, and I think the vast majority of viewers will be convinced that they will have had a lot of fun. And a message to Hollywood: get Hugh Jackman in more movies!

Click Here to see more reviews about: Kate & Leopold (2001)

Meg Ryan (YOU'VE GOT MAIL) and Hugh Jackman (X-MEN) are paired as star-crossed lovers who discover that passion and chivalry never go out of style! When a rip in time brings together a charming 19th century bachelor and a thoroughly 21st century woman, the potential for an old-fashioned modern romance ignites! Also starring Breckin Meyer (ROAD TRIP) and Liev Schreiber (SCREAM 3).

Buy NowGet 33% OFF

Click here for more information about Kate & Leopold (2001)

Thursday, August 4, 2011

Always (1989) Review

Always (1989)
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
Richard Dreyfuss is a pilot, and kind of a wild card when it comes to his fire fighter flying. This concerns the people around him, girlfriend Holly Hunter and best friend John Goodman, but Dreyfuss shruggs it off because this is what he does. Finally Hunter convinces him he should take a job in Flat Rock, Colorado training pilots to do what he does. Unfortunately he never makes it to Flat Rock, at least not in the flesh. Not trying to give too much away, Dreyfuss comes back as a sort of guardian angel, forced to deal with two things: his love for Hunter and his duty to a young pilot she falls for.
Always is a well made picture. From Spielberg we expect nothing less, though I think his name hinders this film**. The cinematography and the score are excellent as in all his films, as are the action sequences involving the planes. However, the acting is the strongest part of this film. This is the kind of role Dreyfuss shines in. His fusion of wit and sincere emotion is wonderfull and he delivers some difficult monologues which would seem trite is lesser hands. Holly Hunter and John Goodman are excellent as the people dealing with his loss. Also Audrey Hepburn makes her final screen appearance in two scenes as an angel (how fitting).
**I have this theory about Always. It was almost universally panned by critics, but I think the criticism is directed more at Spielberg than at the film. Certainly Spielberg has made better pictures, and perhaps this film was made on a grander scale than it needed to be, but I think if any other director had done this film it would not have received so much scrutiny. But, I also believe in the hands of a lesser director this movie would not be as good. Always combines action, humor, genuine sorrow, and happiness , and it combines them well, which is no small achievement. Spielberg made a good film, let it go.

Click Here to see more reviews about: Always (1989)

ALWAYS - DVD Movie

Buy NowGet 20% OFF

Click here for more information about Always (1989)

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Nights in Rodanthe (2008) Review

Nights in Rodanthe (2008)
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
This is a real tear-jerker. The acting is fantastic and the emotions seem very real. The story line is well-considered, but it is definitely not the typical love story. The best way to describe this film is that it just feels real. You could imagine the characters being pulled off the screen and placed in the "real world" without any problem. I would definitely recommend Nights in Rodanthe to those who like a good love story with plenty of drama.

Click Here to see more reviews about: Nights in Rodanthe (2008)

The stars of Unfaithful rekindle their screen chemistry in this rich tale of hearts awakenings based on a bestseller by Nicholas Sparks (The Notebook, Message in a Bottle). Richard Gere is Paul, a surgeon who long ago unwittingly traded career for family. Diane Lane is Adrienne, a devoted mother trying to move on after her husbands infidelity and struggling with his desire to return to their marriage. At a remote inn on the Outer Banks, Paul and Adrienne expect to do some serious soul-searching. But an approaching storm forces each to turn to the other for strength, setting the stage for a life-resonating romance.

Buy NowGet 60% OFF

Click here for more information about Nights in Rodanthe (2008)

Saturday, March 19, 2011

When In Rome (2010) Review

When In Rome (2010)
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
I love the people who trash romantic comedies that deliver exactly what you expect a romantic comedy to deliver. "When in Rome" is nothing more and nothing less than a cookie cutter chick flick about romance, finding love, a happy ending, with some jokes thrown in to make you laugh. I enjoyed the movie and for the fee of renting it on demand, felt it was well worth the 91 minutes of run time, not including previews of course. Please people, who doesn't think that Kristen Bell is cute and even my girlfriend perks up a little when Josh Duhamel comes on screen.
Kristen Bell plays a working woman who finds her job much more rewarding than any relationship she can find. It doesn't mean she isn't sad nothing has worked out with the men in her life. It just means that she can feel rewarded standing on her own two feet. Hello, am I connecting with the female population yet? She is a lead curator at the Guggenheim museum and just when she concedes to living a life of solitaire, her sister decides to get married and things go a little haywire. So off to Rome she flies for a weekend of family hell.
While in the romantic city she picks a few coins out of a fountain and unknowingly captures the hearts of some lucky dudes who had previously dropped them in the mysterious fountain. While the magic is working its way towards insanity she meets Josh Duhamel who happens to actually like her. The two of them make a great pair. As corny as the scene is with breaking the vase and short circuiting the electricity, it actually made me laugh. Without giving too much away, the commercials do that all too well already, I will say that several scenes had me laughing pretty loud at times. It really was a funny movie, even if it was a little trite and predictable.
In my book Dax Shepard was absolutely hilarious with his washboard stomach. He spent most of the movie with his shirt off as he looked at himself almost as much as he sat admiring Kristen Bell. How this guy is not cast in more movies is beyond me, but we can continue to enjoy his work next season in Parenthood.
Anyway, I enjoyed the movie. If you go in expecting a nice romantic comedy with several funny scenes you will leave happy. It isn't anything ground breaking and there is no thought involved. It is simply 91 minutes of mindless entertainment where everything works out in the end. What more can you ask from a movie of this nature. In my book it delivered, so have a few laughs and move on to the next one. Hollywood has been making these since the moving picture was invented, and it will continue as long as people buy the tickets to see them. I for one think it was adequately worth the price.

Click Here to see more reviews about: When In Rome (2010)

An ambitious young New Yorker (Kristen Bell), disillusioned with romance, takes a whirlwind trip to Rome where she defiantly plucks magic coins from a fountain of love, inexplicably igniting the passion of those who threw them in: a sausage magnate (Danny DeVito), a street magician (John Heder), an adoring painter (Will Arnet) and a self-admiring model (Dax Shepard). But when a charming reporter (Josh Duhamel) pursues her with equal zest, how will she know if his love is the real thing?

Buy NowGet 67% OFF

Click here for more information about When In Rome (2010)